MEMORIAL

LUIS CAMNITZER

26.03.11 - 26.06.11 / Sala PAyS

Curator: Florencia Battiti

Memorial es una operación austera y su gesto autoral es mínimo y deliberadamente modesto. Camnitzer literalmente “hace espacio” entre los nombres de los actuales ciudadanos uruguayos en la guía telefónica para introducir la presencia insoslayable de quienes fueron privados de sus derechos, primero, y de su vida, después. Se trata de una reescritura, de una intervención silenciosa pero potente. En sintonía con sus trabajos previos, Camnitzer concibe a la palabra como un elemento visual primordial de su propuesta y resignifica objetos y contextos de uso cotidiano al utilizarlos de manera no ortodoxa. 

Posted in Art

EL VIEJO SUEÑO DE LA CASITA PROPIA

ELDA CERRATO

29.06.19 - 13.10.19 / Espacio Base de Datos

Curators: María Alejandra Gatti – Cecilia Nisembaum

The age-old dream of a house of one’s own 

It was 1983 and Elda Cerrato was part of the exhibition “La sombra de la democracia” (The Shadow of Democracy) in the gallery Hilda Solano. Elda presented a work to be hung with pins on the wall, alluding to the fragility of the recently recovered democracy. This artistic and political gesture was questioned by the curator of the exposition who asked to frame the work in order to avoid its political interpretation. However, in spite of this questioning, Elda didn’t back down and, supported by the rest of the participating artists, the work was finally exhibited hanging on pins.

We find this story interesting because, even if in a collateral way, it introduces some of the core concepts across Elda Cerrato’s work: the concern for the state of democracy, the role that institutions must play in order to achieve their full development, and the presence of the crowds as a constant of resistance and confrontation against apathy and state abuses.

“El viejo sueño de la casita propia” put together a group of works produced during the seventies and nineties related to the tie between the Judiciary and the State. From this perspective, the chosen works invite us to question the meaning that this relationship represents in the history of our country and the rest of Latin America, and the way in which, currently, this tie seems distorted by post-truth politics.

 In this way, the exhibition allows us to question the own notion of State, together with certain processes that appear to recur throughout Argentine history; particularly the swinging from a welfare state to a neoliberal state, whose economical politics reduce to the minimum the intervention in social affairs.

In light of this oscillating circumstance, what support frameworks are provided by the law? Who has and who doesn’t have the right to dream of a house of one’s own? What happens when the State, who is supposed to ensure the rights is the one that breaks them or infringes them systematically?

When it comes to Human Rights, Argentine justice has doubtlessly been a model. Trials of crimes against humanity, which are still ongoing, respond to the claims of a society that, in line with Organismos de Derechos Humanos, has become aware of the “Nunca Más” and mostly shows willing to continue with the policies or memory, truth, and justice. However, these days, the judicial system faces a deep institutional crisis that casts doubt on its veracity that the very same system shows, in other words, in what ways the information is manipulated and how they hide, shape or even make up the facts. Therefore, in words of the researcher Guadalupe Nogués, “The post-truth manifests itself as a sort of architectured, cohesive and systematic lie in which inner coherence wins the bid against the real world”

From these perspectives, Elda Cerrato’s productions are crossed by geographical movements chosen or forced by the local and Latin American political circumstances, and by a particular sensibility towards spiritual search and perceptual experiences. Recovering the critical view of a female artist whose work is resignified from our uncertain present, is without a doubt an accurate gesture of a memory space that attempts to rethink the past from the critical power of contemporary art. 

Elda Cerrato (Asti, Italia, 1930) has an intense artistic activity that includes individual exhibitions in Argentina and abroad, some of them have been in Museo de Bellas Artes de Caracas, Museo de las Américas de Washington and Museo de Arte Moderno de Bs.As. She has participated with her work –paintings, drawings, engravings, installations, interventions, and films– in more than 150 collective exhibitions in Europe, Asia and North, Central and South America, as well as biennials and national salons in Argentina and Venezuela, and international biennials, where she obtained awards. She lived and work in Caracas during two long periods, the last one between 1977 and 1983.

As she develops her work, she dedicates a great amount of time to teaching, academic and research activities. Since 1960, she has worked in schools of art and universities in Argentina and abroad, particularly in Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo and Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, both part of Universidad de Buenos Aires, and Escuela de Arte del Departamento de Humanidades part of Universidad Central de Venezuela. Currently, she lives and works in Argentina.
Posted in Art

YOUTH ENCOUNTER

Reflection Days on Human Rights

From the Education area of ​​the Parque de la Memoria, we carry out the “Youth Meeting, Reflection Day on Human Rights”, aimed at secondary schools of CABA and AMBA.

This proposal is framed within the need to continue expanding the channels of expression of young people and to rethink Human Rights issues by drawing bridges between the past and the present.

We believe in the power of the meeting between courses from different secondary schools that meet to debate and share reflections on related topics. Generating spaces for reflection and work among young people is enriching since it strengthens the construction of critical readings of reality, added to the importance of active participation and the exchange of voices among students.

Participating schools per thematic:

Gender Violence:

Escuela Primaria N° 14, Dr. E. Padilla.
Escuela de Educación Secundaria N° 151.
Escuela de Educación Secundaria N° 40.
Instituto Evangélico Americano.
Colegio 19 DE 17 “Luis Pasteur”.
Colegio de Educación Integral Manuelita.
Instituto Parroquial San José..
Escuela Secundaria N° 119.

State Violence: 

Escuela de Educación Secundaria N° 151.
Instituto Evangélico Americano.
Instituto Parroquial San José.
Instituto Raíces y Alas.
ENS N°2 “Mariano Acosta”.

POSTERS PROJECT 2012

"Genocides"

In the first edition of the 2012 Poster Project, the Genocide theme was worked on. During this edition, the cases of the Armenian Genocide, the Holocaust, the Argentine dictatorship and Rwanda were studied.

Accompanying institution

We thank those who contributed theoretical material for the formation of the Team, offered support in the artistic tool and dedicated their time to orienting us on the subject matter worked on:

Fundación Luisa Hairabedian

POSTERS PROJECT 2013

"Gender violence from the point of view of young men and women"

During the 2013 Poster Project, the theme of “Gender violence” was worked on. In this edition we worked with the axes: adolescent love, prevention of human trafficking and domestic violence.

Accompanying institution

We thank those who contributed theoretical material for the formation of the Team, offered support in the artistic tool and dedicated their time to orienting us on the subject matter worked on:

Fundación Mujeres en Igualdad

POSTERS PROJECT 2014

"Discriminatory practices against migrants"

The Memory Park Education team presents the following activities guide for the classroom to the teachers who are part of the Project Posters. This proposal is organized in the four thematic axes that guide the project:

1. The origins and characteristics of Argentine migration, seeks to investigate the motivations of migration in Argentina at the end of the 19th century, taking into account the national political thinking of that time. It also aims to reflect on the idea that migration was “exclusively European” incorporating information on the characteristics of border migration.

2. Immigration, work and living conditions, proposes thinking about work as the engine of migration, characteristics, conditions and problems of the work and migration relationship at present for the receiving country.

3. Migration and regulatory frameworks, aims to understand and compare the laws that regulate migration in Argentina, from a retrospective perspective and in relation to the socio-political contexts of its production, trying to problematize the conceptions of institutionally constructed migrants.

4. Representations of migration, presents different views of migration in artistic expressions, which allows identifying stereotypes about migrants. We suggest that you take into account at least one of the activities for each axis with the students to activate the debate and as a framework for the meetings and the subsequent production of the posters.

At the end of the document there is a chronology of migration from the end of the 20th century to the present day, which, by way of synthesis, relates migratory movements to the political, social, economic characteristics and regulatory regulatory frameworks of each context.

Accompanying institution

We thank those who contributed theoretical material for the formation of the Team, offered support in the artistic tool and dedicated their time to orienting us on the subject matter worked on:

INADI

POSTERS PROJECT 2015

"Youth and rights. Views on institutional violence today"

We understand by human rights those rights that correspond to all human beings by the mere fact of being people. Therefore, the religion, gender or sexuality, nationality or ethnicity of a person is not relevant.
person or group, not even their age. In this sense, and as expressed in the preamble to the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights (IACHR), these are based solely on the attributes of the person.
However, the legal recognition of these rights is the product of traumatic events that in the 20th century impacted on the conscience of humanity, and are also the product of the struggle of various social actors.
that they publicly demanded the recognition of the same.

On the one hand, human rights are linked to the dignity of the people, at the same time that they represent limits to the power of the States since they are barriers to the exercise of public power. According to international human rights treaties and the Constitution of each of the countries that sign them, they are the States
who assume the obligations to respect and guarantee these rights.

Starting from understanding the role that States have in guaranteeing and respecting human rights, we can think and analyze what we are talking about when we speak of human rights violations.

A violation of human rights is the consequence of a state action or omission. There is a violation by action when the State, through a state agent, acts in breach of the norms and outside the ethical framework offered by the human rights established by law in the National Constitution and in international treaties. Instead, the violation by omission will be given by the assumption where the State does not intervene
in a situation in which he was legally obliged to act so that a right is guaranteed.

In other words, in order to consider a case as a violation of human rights, in addition to the right that has been violated, the participation of a state agent is necessary regardless of their function or hierarchy. When you talk
state agent we mean all state employees, both from the Executive Branch, as well as the Legislative, Judicial, public administration and security forces, both at the national and provincial levels
or communal.

Generally, in Argentina when we hear about human rights violations we think of the massive violations committed by the actions of state terrorism, during the last civic-military dictatorship and in
the previous years (1969-1983). In the 4th edition of the Poster Project, we intend to broaden this view of rights and their protection to account for cases of human rights violations today. Although they are not comparable to the actions carried out by State terrorism through the systematic plan of kidnapping, torture, disappearance and murder of people, thinking in historical terms allows us to review and analyze differences and continuities.

Accompanying institution

We thank those who contributed theoretical material for the formation of the Team, offered support in the artistic tool and dedicated their time to orienting us on the subject matter worked on:

Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales – CELS

POSTERS PROJECT 2016

"Youth in perspective. What does it mean to be young today?"

On March 24, 2016 it was 40 years since the last coup. From that moment on, it is that State Terrorism, already present in Argentina for several years ago, unloaded all its repressive power on broad social sectors. The painful balance of the last civic-military dictatorship was 30,000 people arrested, disappeared, thousands of political prisoners, censorship, fear and social discipline on the basis of terror. In the framework of this new anniversary of the last coup, it is that we intend to think and carry out the 5th edition of the Project Posters. Thinking about the present with memory.

Youth, as it is recognized today, arises during the second postwar period in the context of the imposition of the ways of life of the victors and the growth in the level of consumption, through the consolidation of the Welfare States in Western Europe and the United States. Thus, the youth was configured as an independent group, a conscious social  actor, and as the owner of a properly youthful culture.

Many times youth sectors were identified as the “bad apple” of our society, where morality and “good customs” had been lost. In this way, State Terrorism relentlessly persecuted youths, murdering and disappearing those young people who committed to their time. Not only was violence and the systematic practice of disappearance carried out, but they also used spaces for socialization youth as forms of social discipline through intimidation and strict control of their behaviors (school, factory, public spaces such as squares, bars, discos, etc.). In this sense, it is no coincidence that more than 80% of the detainees-disappeared from the last civic-military dictatorship were people between 16 and 35 years old (CONADEP, 2006), making it clear that one of the intentions of Terrorism in State was to silence the different expressions that the youth was carrying out.

However, during the last 40 years, broad youth sectors accompanied other social actors in the changes that took place at the political, social, cultural and artistic levels in Argentina. From the resistance in the middle of the civic-military dictatorship, the fight for the prosecution of the genocides to the counter-cultural movements of rock or the fight for a fair and equal education, young people helped to raise new ways of relating to each other.

Based on the aforementioned, we believe that young people are relevant actors not only in the great historical events but also in the development of daily life. Being young means constantly being in the focus of society, encountering an adult world that is often alien and loaded with stigma. For this reason, in this 5th edition of the Project Posters “Youth in perspective. What does it mean to be young today? ”, Let’s focus on thinking about youth.

This year, the MINU, a non-profit Civil Association, will accompany us in the work process, dedicated to the development of educational programs that promote the participation of young people in society. From the association, participatory projects are developed on different axes, seeking that young people are recognized as a factor of change in the different topics addressed and in society in general. They are also dedicated to the design and advice in the generation of participative educational dynamics with social organizations and public bodies.

During the process of thinking and designing this new edition of the Poster Project, we understood that we can provide theoretical, practical, conceptual and historical tools. However, who better than young people to think and tell what is their own view of the world? This is why we feel it necessary and we find it enriching to give voice to young people, in order for them to offer us the view they have today about themselves and about what is happening around them:

What happens to young people when they listen to the ways in which they represent themselves? Is it possible to transform those looks? What are the current spaces where young people express themselves? What forms of participation exist among young people? We are interested in this 5th Edition of the Poster Project that young people can express their gaze in an artistic production of its own, which at the same time serves to transmit and debate along with others about those views.
Within it, we take the neighborhood as a central place for city dwellers. A neighborhood is a portion of the city, which usually has its own identity and whose inhabitants can be seen reflected in it in different ways. Identity with a neighborhood is not an essence but an identification process that can continue or be lost. Historically, popular neighborhoods were familiar in tone for their occupants. Customs, daily rituals, work experiences, collaboration networks between neighbors, the appropriation of common spaces, facilitated the creation of a sense of belonging. Currently, the neighborhood can be interpreted in different ways, there being a multiplicity of neighborhood ways of life, according to who or who are questioned, becoming complex, changing spaces, of tension but also of belonging. The place that the neighborhood occupies for young people will be one of the questions from which we will start to think about this Project.

On the other hand, historically, public space is the place par excellence for demonstration and resistance. Faced with the impossibility of being heard the claims or needs in other instances, the groups turn to the public space in order to make their demands visible. Even in the moments when public space was more controlled, as happened during the civic-military dictatorships in Argentina, it was still a place of expression and resistance. The rounds of the Mothers and Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo breaking into the plaza to denounce the disappearance of their children and the appropriation of their grandchildren, is one of the many examples that we can cite. At present, mobilizations continue to be one of the privileged forms of protest and expression of the population. The street, on the other hand, is also the stage where people gather not only to complain but to celebrate and feel united. The full use of this scenario constitutes a fundamental right that fosters the collective interest over the individual property right. However, at present, the taking of public space continues to present itself as a conflict in some sectors or the media, generating various debates on the forms of use and expression.

One of the many ways to intervene in public space is through artistic expressions. These are often used by collectives or artistic groups as a form of action and transmission of slogans of all kinds. In this way, street art is one of the many forms of social, cultural and political expression that both societies and states have known how to use throughout history. The urban space is continuously intervened by different people or artistic groups that express ideas, concerns or commemorate historical dates or events.

Taking into account what was said previously, in this edition of the Project Posters – “What do we do on the street? Uses and disputes of public space “, we propose to think and put into debate with young people the uses of public space in these three axes: the neighborhood, the manifestations and resistance that take the street as a place of expression and the intervention of street art as one more resource of urban expression. In the present material, we will develop these axes in a broader way, presenting above all the questions that we consider important to ask ourselves today together with the young people, in order to debate the current reality and their views on it. At the end of the material, we will also present some activities and suggestions for working on these topics in the classroom.

Accompanying institution

We thank those who contributed theoretical material for the formation of the Team, offered support in the artistic tool and dedicated their time to orienting us on the subject matter worked on:

MINU

 

POSTERS PROJECT 2017

"What do we do on the streets? Uses and disputes of public space"

During 2017, the Project Posters aims to open the discussion with the young people about the uses of public space, taking this space as a scene of conflict and dispute, but at the same time as the place of dialogue and encounter between citizens and the State. We understand public space as the space where we interact with others, we express ourselves and where we materialize our citizen practices. It is also the place where disputes and social inequalities are reflected, often being a space in tension. Thus, the public space is shaped into a physical, symbolic and political space where different social and cultural groups, of gender and age, come together. A place of expression of rights and, therefore, a space on which it is necessary to reflect.

Within it, we take the neighborhood as a central place for city dwellers. A neighborhood is a portion of the city, which usually has its own identity and whose inhabitants can be seen reflected in it in different ways. Identity with a neighborhood is not an essence but an identification process that can continue or be lost. Historically, popular neighborhoods were familiar in tone for their occupants. Customs, daily rituals, work experiences, collaboration networks between neighbors, the appropriation of common spaces, facilitated the creation of a sense of belonging. Currently, the neighborhood can be interpreted in different ways, there being a multiplicity of neighborhood ways of life, according to who or who are questioned, becoming complex, changing spaces, of tension but also of belonging. The place that the neighborhood occupies for young people will be one of the questions from which we will start to think about this Project.

One of the many ways to intervene in public space is through artistic expressions. These are often used by collectives or artistic groups as a form of action and transmission of slogans of all kinds. In this way, street art is one of the many forms of social, cultural and political expression that both societies and states have known how to use throughout history. The urban space is continuously intervened by different people or artistic groups that express ideas, concerns or commemorate historical dates or events.

Taking into account what was said previously, in this edition of the Project Posters – “What do we do on the street? Uses and disputes of public space “, we propose to think and put into debate with young people the uses of public space in these three axes: the neighborhood, the manifestations and resistance that take the street as a place of expression and the intervention of street art as one more resource of urban expression. In the present material, we will develop these axes in a broader way, presenting above all the questions that we consider important to ask ourselves today together with the young people, in order to debate the current reality and their views on it. At the end of the material, we will also present some activities and suggestions for working on these topics in the classroom.

Accompanying institution

We thank those who contributed theoretical material for the formation of the Team, offered support in the artistic tool and dedicated their time to orienting us on the subject matter worked on:

Iconoclasistas

POSTERS PROJECT 2018

"Genres and identities under construction: Rethinking the norm and ways of being".

During 2018, the Project Posters aims to open with young people the discussion on issues related to gender identities and diversities.

We believe that working on this issue in schools is central, since they are the space for socialization and constitution of identities par excellence, and central to guaranteeing the rights of students. Taking into account the various discriminatory practices, such as harassment, physical and psychological harassment, and even in cases extreme situations of physical violence, it is of utmost importance and urgency to work diversities with young people to disarm myths and prejudices, identify the stereotypes that are reproduced, in order to achieve better coexistence and equality in diversities. We believe that when working on these topics within the educational field a multiplier effect is generated within the school and outside the institution, since students can build a present and a different future society with learning that promotes what they learn, raising respect, solidarity and equal rights.

Working these themes within the school institution will allow us to reflect on ideas related to gender identities and diversities, recognize, analyze the gender roles imposed on us socially, identify and disarm prejudices and myths, debate and reflect on the social conquests achieved in recent times. At the same time, we are interested in analyzing what impact they have on society, identifying what spaces of expression / debate / inclusion are generated within the normative parameters of educational institutions, and promoting debate about current issues related to diversities and identities. of gender for the construction of a critical citizenship.

In this edition, we will work together with the Tantosha Center, which for many years have been developing tools for debate, analysis and work on gender and diversity issues. In this sense, we are very excited to count on your experience and support for the design of this booklet, nourished by internal training. We appreciate the collaboration of Lic. Gabriela A. Ramos and Lic. Gabriela Veloz Rúa, as well as the Coexistence in Diversity Team of the City’s Sub-secretariat for Human Rights.

Accompanying institution

We appreciate the help provided and the time they took to orient us on the topic worked on:


Centro Tantosha